How can we best understand the basic issue of compatibility between the theories of Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity without having to grapple with equations?
Quantum Mechanics does not deal with gravity, because for most quantum phenomena, the influence of gravity is completely negligible. Starting with the electromagnetic force, it has eventually successfully integrated the weak and the strong nuclear forces. To give it a universal status, however, we need to introduce the fourth type of interaction, gravity. No problem, right, we’ll just quantize gravity! But not so fast! According to General Relativity, gravity isn’t just, like the other three, a force, or a field, acting within spacetime, it’s intimately linked to the fabric of spacetime itself. Quantizing gravity, therefore, means quantizing spacetime as well. OK, now we have a quantum of space, and of time.
Here is the rub, though. Imagine that you are sitting with a ruler of that quantum length, whatever it may turn out to be. By definition, there can’t be a smaller length, anywhere in the universe. Ah, but Special Relativity (Lorentz transformation) tells us that there is a referential, in movement with respect to you, where the observed length of that ruler will be smaller. In fact, we can make it arbirarily smaller by increasing the relative speeds. Well, that doesn’t work, does it?
That is the basic conflict. On the mathematical side, plugging in the equations, we get meaningless infinities all over the place. Many approaches have been tried, but they usually modify special relativity. Is there a way to keep such a beautiful piece of work intact? Well, it turns out that there is. The price to pay: it introduces non-local effects, the notion that physics at a certain point is spacetime can be affected by what happens very far from it. We already know this to be true in the case of entanglement, so why not accept it in a much more general context?
The beauty of this approach, is that it is testable. Scientist are working on an experiment that will tell whether that approach is the right one. Stay tuned!
Once again, our “common sense” cannot be trusted. The laws of the universe may well turn out to be even weirder than we imagined. What an exciting time to be alive!
Alessio Belenchia, Dionigi M. T. Benincasa, Stefano Liberati, Francesco Marin, Francesco Marino, Antonello Ortolan. Testing Quantum Gravity Induced Nonlocality via Optomechanical Quantum Oscillators.Physical Review Letters, 2016; 116 (16) DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.161303
about the man Einstein called his “spiritual son” and the Dalai Lama his “science guru.”
In this inspiring talk, the mathematician Edward Frenkel speaks about the beauty and elegance of mathematics
How can there be intelligence without consciousness?
Neuroscience and psychology have been unable to address the hard problem of consciousness
So-called “information realism” has some surprising implications
Galaxies can move with each other across huge distances, and against the predictions of basic cosmological models.
Any theory of quantum gravity is going to have to grapple with some weird time stuff.
In quantum physics, it appears that only relationships are real.
Physicists See Hints of X17, an Elusive Particle That Could Be a New Force of Nature
Reversing history from Galileo's time, it is now the scientists who refuse to look through the telescope.
Please enter your email and we’ll send you instructions to reset your password