Reprinted from Quanta Magazine.
A controversial new paper argues that universes with dark energy profiles like ours do not exist in the “landscape” of universes allowed by string theory.
On June 25, Timm Wrase awoke in Vienna and groggily scrolled through an online repository of newly posted physics papers. One title startled him into full consciousness.
The paper, by the prominent string theorist Cumrun Vafa of Harvard University and collaborators, conjectured a simple formula dictating which kinds of universes are allowed to exist and which are forbidden, according to string theory. The leading candidate for a “theory of everything” weaving the force of gravity together with quantum physics, string theory defines all matter and forces as vibrations of tiny strands of energy. The theory permits some 10500 different solutions: a vast, varied “landscape” of possible universes. String theorists like Wrase and Vafa have strived for years to place our particular universe somewhere in this landscape of possibilities.
But now, Vafa and his colleagues were conjecturing that in the string landscape, universes like ours — or what ours is thought to be like — don’t exist. If the conjecture is correct, Wrase and other string theorists immediately realized, the cosmos must either be profoundly different than previously supposed or string theory must be wrong.
After dropping his kindergartner off that morning, Wrase went to work at the Vienna University of Technology, where his colleagues were also buzzing about the paper. That same day, in Okinawa, Japan, Vafa presented the conjecture at the Strings 2018 conference, which was streamed by physicists worldwide. Debate broke out on- and off-site. “There were people who immediately said, ‘This has to be wrong,’ other people who said, ‘Oh, I’ve been saying this for years,’ and everything in the middle,” Wrase said. There was confusion, he added, but “also, of course, huge excitement. Because if this conjecture was right, then it has a lot of tremendous implications for cosmology.”
Researchers have set to work trying to test the conjecture and explore its implications. Wrase has already written two papers, including one that may lead to a refinement of the conjecture, and both mostly while on vacation with his family. He recalled thinking, “This is so exciting. I have to work and study that further.”
The conjectured formula — posed in the June 25 paper by Vafa, Georges Obied, Hirosi Ooguri and Lev Spodyneiko and further explored in a second paper released two days later by Vafa, Obied, Prateek Agrawal and Paul Steinhardt — says, simply, that as the universe expands, the density of energy in the vacuum of empty space must decrease faster than a certain rate. The rule appears to be true in all simple string theory-based models of universes. But it violates two widespread beliefs about the actual universe: It deems impossible both the accepted picture of the universe’s present-day expansion and the leading model of its explosive birth.
To read the complete article visit: https://www.quantamagazine.org/dark-energy-may-be-incompatible-with-string-theory-20180809/
Donald Hoffman reminds us that we can predict people's choices up to seven seconds before they are conscious of making that choice.
These black hole opposites would spew energy, be impossible to enter, and might even answer some of the universe’s fundamental questions.
A Link Between Dark Matter and Antimatter Could Be Why the Universe Exists
The “fittest” quantum properties make the most copies of themselves.
Reversing history from Galileo's time, it is now the scientists who refuse to look through the telescope.
One of the great unsolved problems of modern physics is coming up with a theory of everything
Ever wonder how we try to predict the unpredictable? Supercomputers use the power of chaos theory.
Any theory of quantum gravity is going to have to grapple with some weird time stuff.
New evidence shows that the key assumption made in the discovery of dark energy is in error
This video is about Bell's Theorem, one of the most fascinating results in 20th century physics.
It's not only a big deal; it's the biggest deal of all.
Please enter your email and we’ll send you instructions to reset your password