image description image description

LATEST DIALOGUES New Theory Says We Are All Multiple Personalities of a Cosmic Consciousness

From the comfortable seat of our bodies (and built-in brains), it’s easy to think that consciousness is a unique property of humans. But some philosophers argue that the entire universe is conscious, or to put it more broadly: that there is only cosmic consciousness.

This solves the problem of where consciousness comes from, but it leaves other lingering dilemmas — such as why do people (and other living organisms) have private consciousnesses that are less-than cosmic-sized? And if you and I are part of the same cosmic consciousness, why can’t I read your thoughts simply by shifting the focus of my attention?

In a paper published earlier this year in the Journal of Consciousness Studies, philosopher and author Bernardo Kastrup tackles these and many other questions by using the analogy of dissociative identity disorder (DID), what was once known as multiple personality disorder.

Kastrup starts with the premise that cosmic consciousness is everything. The material environment, along with the properties of matter, are physical manifestations of the thoughts and feelings of this consciousness. These are the “revealed” and “concealed” aspects of the cosmos, respectively.

He then argues that all living organisms, including people, are dissociated alters of the cosmic consciousness. This is similar to how people with DID can have multiple personalities — or alters — coexisting within the same psyche. In both cases, the alters are part of the whole, with each having its own private consciousness.

Kastrup’s approach is a modification of a theory called “cosmopsychism,” which asserts that the smallest unit of consciousness spans the entire cosmos. Other theories based on this have tried to reach the level of human consciousness by breaking apart cosmic consciousness into smaller units and then putting them back together to form a higher-level consciousness.

Kastrup avoids this “recombination problem” by turning to dissociation. This involves separating off parts of the cosmic consciousness into alters, or “relative subjects.” Each of these segments of cosmic consciousness has a distinct boundary, along with a sense of self-identity, or I-ness.

And like the cosmic consciousness itself, the alters have both a concealed aspect (thoughts and feelings) and a revealed aspect (physical body, metabolism, senses, etc.).

Kastrup writes that “cosmic dissociation happens precisely at the level of living beings with unitary consciousness, such as you and me.” He also includes other organisms in this definition, from plants and mammals down to the smallest bacteria and viruses.

All alters are separated from the rest of the cosmic consciousness — while still being part of it — by a dissociation boundary. Unlike the boundaries of inanimate objects, the boundaries of living organisms are not arbitrary.

Take a mug, for example: whether the handle of the mug is an integral part of its “mug-ness” is an arbitrary decision. You could just as easily have a mug without a handle.

But with living organisms, our boundaries coincide with where we perceive our body to end. We can perceive photons that strike our retinas or our skin, but not those that strike a wall or chair. We also can’t decide that one part of our skin is not integral to our body the way we decide a handle is not integral to a mug.

Likewise, we can will the parts of our body to move. But we can’t will the bodies of other living organisms (alters) to move in the same way. This is part of what makes us distinct from each other.

The dissociative boundary is so strong — along with our ego and I-ness — that we see ourselves as distinctly separate from the cosmic consciousness. But this, according to Kastrup, is only an illusion.

Perception exists only across this dissociative boundary. It occurs when the “outside” impinges on the boundary that surrounds an alter — such as when photons strike the retina or a feather touches the skin.

What we perceive as the inanimate world surrounding us is really the revealed aspect of the cosmic consciousness’ thoughts and feelings — the same consciousness that we are part of. And what we see as other living organisms are the revealed aspects of other dissociated alters.

What we perceive, though, is not an exact replica of what is actually outside us. Instead, it is a representation of the outside. So the colors, sounds, flavors, and textures that we experience are different from what is experienced by the cosmic consciousness surrounding us.

Kastrup writes that alters are like islands immersed in a single ocean. Because we are all in the same ocean, we experience the universe in roughly the same way.

And because we also only have access to the “outside” across the dissociative boundary, we are unable to change the laws of nature, read other people’s minds, or bend a spoon with just our thoughts.

But this theory allows us to rest in knowing that we are part of something greater than ourselves, even if we are living in our own dissociative bubble.

Related Dialogues

Please select the social network you want to share this page with:

We like you too :)
Shawn Radcliffe is a science writer, yoga instructor and creator of fiction and humor. He has written about science, health, meditation and yoga for Healthline.com, Men's Fitness, Greater Good and more. He also tackles the humorous implications of spirituality and science on his blog, Branáin - Ravenously Curious.
close

3 Responses to “New Theory Says We Are All Multiple Personalities of a Cosmic Consciousness”

  1. August 05, 2018 at 5:12 pm, jrliske said:

    Interesting read! Very insightful.

  2. August 13, 2018 at 6:40 am, orva said:

    Kastrup is great. The way his work crosses what used to be the boundary between mysticism and hard science. He is helping Monistic Idealism to go mainstream. That to me is extraordinarily valuable in that realization of our Oneness is the great last good hope that humanity can survive and truly progress. To me [and I’m sure some would disagree] the ideas in this article are very much in harmony with traditional Advaita Vedanta.
    The Vedanta has the advantage as far as mass consumption goes in that it fulfills the Unconscious’ need for universal archetypes…

  3. August 14, 2018 at 2:24 pm, Joe Masterleo said:

    All of these levels, or “dissociative states,” according to the author, are different levels of light energy vibrating at various frequencies. Said frequencies flow or cascade from a single source in the Singularity, creating all things visible and invisible. Says here, it doesn’t matter what you call them, what language, symbols or rituals used to recognize them. However, I’d be loathe to liken their ultimate cosmic source, divinity, as “dissociative” in nature or composition. “Dissociative” is a human construct borrowed from the language of the behavioral sciences with pathology overtones. World religions tell us that Spirit is the only constant in the universe. Physics tells us that the light is the only constant in the universe. No conflict here. Things equal to the same thing are equal to each other. Therefore, Spirit = Light, “in whom all things consist and are held together” (Col. 1:17, New Testament). In fact, the word “universe” means “a reality turning around on one thing.” Everything and everyone is a degree of that one thing — light — vibrating a various coordinated frequencies. Any “dissociation” among the multiple and overlapping vibratory frequencies do not exist in reality, but are merely constructs of the dualistic mind that cannot see all things in unity.

Leave a Reply

image description image description

Thanks To Our Sponsors