Bondage is being dependent, tied up, limited. On, to, by, what? Is it not attachment to a supposed 'will', which is the exercise of personal, independent choice by that supposition with which what-I-am is identified and which is called 'me'?
This merely means that I use the pronoun 'I' wrongly. I use it as though this objectivisation here were free to do as 'it' wished, whenever 'it' wished, and wherever 'it' wished. But such a possibility has never arisen, and never could arise: there is no such possibility - for an objectivisation can do nothing of itself, any more than any piece of mechanism can act autonomously.
How has it been possible to avoid seeing the absurdity of this notion? It has only been possible by imagining or assuming an invisible, imponderable, untraceable 'entity' which takes charge of this mechanism, like the driver of an automobile, and which refers to the machine and its driver together as 'I' and 'me', identifying itself entirely with the apparatus. Is it difficult to recognise that this assumed personality is factually inexistent, that this supposed 'entity' is just a concept?
This exercise of supposed choice and decision, this series of perpetual acts of will or of wilfulness, called 'volition', is what constitutes bondage, and the ensuing conflict, experienced as suffering, is due to the supposed need to act volitionally.
The abandonment of this nonsense must abolish the cause of bondage, bondage being bondage to volition expressed as 'I', and implying the phenomenal object concerned. With the understanding of the incongruity of this notion nothing is left to be bound, and nothing is left that can suffer as 'me'.
For I - as what I am, as all I am - am no object. The word 'I' says it. So what is there to be bound, where is there any me-object to suffer, when could there be any conflict and with what?
This assumed 'entity', unidentifiable and an unfounded supposition, acts only as 'volition'. I, as what I am, have none - for I am no object that could have 'volition'. I do not act, there is no actor - for an 'actor' is a concept in mind which could not act as such. What I am is devoid of any trace of objectivity. In short, and once again - in no circumstances am I any sort or kind of 'entity'.
What I am is expressed phenomenally as see-ing, hear-ing, feel-ing, taste-ing, smell-ing, think-ing, but there is no objective 'I' that sees, hears, feels, tastes, smells or thinks. How then could I exercise 'volition', choose, decide, accept, refuse, or play the clown in any such phenomenal performance?
Objects 'live' sensorially or are 'lived' sensorially, and what I am is their sentience. If I so function, objects live as they must - and there is no need for the notions of bondage, conflict, or suffering - since I do not, and can not, exercise 'volition' which alone is responsible for these.
What absurd clowns 'we' are whose joke is to 'want', to 'wish', to 'desire', 'hope', 'regret'! No wonder clowns are notoriously tragic figures at heart!
Wei Wu Wei
What may or may not be appropriate behavior for a spiritual teacher?
Discover the esoteric relationship between form and formlessness embedded within the Shema
While we have unlocked the potential of a single atom we have yet to unlock the full potential of wise, loving and compassionate action
Awakened living realizes that the absolute and the relative dimensions of our Being are simply “not-two.”
From the dualistic thinking of the first half of life into the contemplative mind of the integrated self
It is the mind that turns now into past, present and future, and there is no way to leave the now.
Yoga does not bring us to truth, truth expresses itself through yoga.
Silent and serene, forgetting words, bright clarity appears before you.
Zaya Benazzo interviews Mark Dyczkowski on the history of Tantra
This book celebrates the great stripping process of aging, dying and spiritual awakening.
Jun 26–28, 2020
Delight Yoga, Prinseneiland studio, Amsterdam
Eric Baret explains clearly that there is no need for the self to appropriate achievement
"It is not a person that is waking up, it is consciousness."
It’s easy, during our everyday life in the world, to forget how extravagantly remarkable a human being actually is.
Lama Tsomo teaches us the ancient Tibetan compassion practice of Tonglen, one of the Four Boundless Qualities
In most spiritual traditions, love is seen only as universal or cosmic love.
Performing at the opening night of the 2019 SAND gathering in Italy, Parvathy Baul sings and dances
An immersive visual meditative journey with Rupert Spira
The contemplative spirituality of via feminina begins with the practice of gestation.
Dzogchen, the bardo, sleep and the yoga of dreams
Nonduality and Healing from Trauma - The Realization Process
Being fully human requires the awakening of the deep Heart as well as the full embrace of the vulnerable human heart.
In this exclusive interview with Dr. Alan Wallace we discuss consciousness, mathematics, practicing deep sleep states and meditation as preparation for dying consciously.
This excerpt from the The Strange and Necessary Case for Hope is rare medicine for our dark times.
Tandava means totality. It means the path is absolutely non-dual, because we integrate everything and we don't refuse any aspect of the human being
Seeking is an expression of truth, it’s not a way. Yoga does not bring us to truth, truth expresses itself through yoga.
Entering into that territory where the practices that have sustained us no longer can guide us in the terrain we are in.
Exploring, Understanding and Applying Advaita Vedanta
It vibrates in every thing and every not-thing, right off the tip of your nose.
Is it possible to live a life of activity while holding the perception of unity and fulfillment?
The Yamabushi in northern Japan practice a once forbidden ancient religion. While their tradition is at risk of disappearing, it offers a way for those seeking a different path in Japan‘s society.
Peter Russell explains that most human beings—unlike animals—focus on the past and the future, which means they spend their time in a state of discontent.
Francis Lucille answers questions from the audience at SAND 18, bringing his intelligence and wit to a variety of topics
Recognizing that our bodies and our sexuality are sacred is a good way to begin undoing the split between sex and spirit...
What does it mean to be yourself from a nondual perspective?
SAND co-founder Zaya Benazzo interviews Turiya Hanover, co-founder of The Path of Love
When even the sense of being collapses into the utter simplicity of what is.
Richard Rohr, as a Catholic priest and Franciscan Friar, will offer a concise history of how Western Christianity once had, soon lost, tried to retrieve, and now is roundly rediscovering its own traditional understanding of unitive consciousness
The challenges we face and the changes underway signal a genuine transformation of the world
Please enter your email and we’ll send you instructions to reset your password