Bondage is being dependent, tied up, limited. On, to, by, what? Is it not attachment to a supposed 'will', which is the exercise of personal, independent choice by that supposition with which what-I-am is identified and which is called 'me'?
This merely means that I use the pronoun 'I' wrongly. I use it as though this objectivisation here were free to do as 'it' wished, whenever 'it' wished, and wherever 'it' wished. But such a possibility has never arisen, and never could arise: there is no such possibility - for an objectivisation can do nothing of itself, any more than any piece of mechanism can act autonomously.
How has it been possible to avoid seeing the absurdity of this notion? It has only been possible by imagining or assuming an invisible, imponderable, untraceable 'entity' which takes charge of this mechanism, like the driver of an automobile, and which refers to the machine and its driver together as 'I' and 'me', identifying itself entirely with the apparatus. Is it difficult to recognise that this assumed personality is factually inexistent, that this supposed 'entity' is just a concept?
This exercise of supposed choice and decision, this series of perpetual acts of will or of wilfulness, called 'volition', is what constitutes bondage, and the ensuing conflict, experienced as suffering, is due to the supposed need to act volitionally.
The abandonment of this nonsense must abolish the cause of bondage, bondage being bondage to volition expressed as 'I', and implying the phenomenal object concerned. With the understanding of the incongruity of this notion nothing is left to be bound, and nothing is left that can suffer as 'me'.
For I - as what I am, as all I am - am no object. The word 'I' says it. So what is there to be bound, where is there any me-object to suffer, when could there be any conflict and with what?
This assumed 'entity', unidentifiable and an unfounded supposition, acts only as 'volition'. I, as what I am, have none - for I am no object that could have 'volition'. I do not act, there is no actor - for an 'actor' is a concept in mind which could not act as such. What I am is devoid of any trace of objectivity. In short, and once again - in no circumstances am I any sort or kind of 'entity'.
What I am is expressed phenomenally as see-ing, hear-ing, feel-ing, taste-ing, smell-ing, think-ing, but there is no objective 'I' that sees, hears, feels, tastes, smells or thinks. How then could I exercise 'volition', choose, decide, accept, refuse, or play the clown in any such phenomenal performance?
Objects 'live' sensorially or are 'lived' sensorially, and what I am is their sentience. If I so function, objects live as they must - and there is no need for the notions of bondage, conflict, or suffering - since I do not, and can not, exercise 'volition' which alone is responsible for these.
What absurd clowns 'we' are whose joke is to 'want', to 'wish', to 'desire', 'hope', 'regret'! No wonder clowns are notoriously tragic figures at heart!
Wei Wu Wei
This excerpt from the The Strange and Necessary Case for Hope is rare medicine for our dark times.
It is said in Bengal that the Baul tradition originates from a time unknown, beyond what human history can trace
What may or may not be appropriate behavior for a spiritual teacher?
Peter Russell explains that most human beings—unlike animals—focus on the past and the future, which means they spend their time in a state of discontent.
Lama Tsomo teaches us the ancient Tibetan compassion practice of Tonglen, one of the Four Boundless Qualities
Everything in the universe is shakti and spiritual life is the discovery of shakti.
Sally Kempton combines the wisdom of the tradition of Kashmir Shaiva Tantra with the practical understandings of contemporary psychology
Nonduality and Healing from Trauma - The Realization Process
Silent awareness is mostly drawn to light, sound, color, beauty, movement, patterns and contrast.
To think of the human stage as simply for enlightenment shortchanges the potential of humanity.
From the dualistic thinking of the first half of life into the contemplative mind of the integrated self
"It is not a person that is waking up, it is consciousness."
While we have unlocked the potential of a single atom we have yet to unlock the full potential of wise, loving and compassionate action
We may think meditation will improve us, but it’s really about accepting ourselves as we are right now.
It is the mind that turns now into past, present and future, and there is no way to leave the now.
Zaya Benazzo interviews Mark Dyczkowski on the history of Tantra
An immersive visual meditative journey with Rupert Spira
In a rare meeting of minds, and a rare exploration of whether there is a predilection for spirituality, Gabor Mate asks Adyashanti to expand on passages from his recent book My Secret Is Silence.
In this interview with Zaya Benazzo from SAND Italy, Ellen Emmet talks about the relationship between self-enquiry and the exploration of the body through tantra.
"There are so many teachings on the internet today – How am I to choose?"
Dzogchen, the bardo, sleep and the yoga of dreams
Can you live "IN" the Dream world with absolute integrity and authenticity
Discover the esoteric relationship between form and formlessness embedded within the Shema
Exploring, Understanding and Applying Advaita Vedanta
Jun 26–28, 2020
Delight Yoga, Prinseneiland studio, Amsterdam
Awakened living realizes that the absolute and the relative dimensions of our Being are simply “not-two.”
I praise the Supreme Goddess Parā, the Illuminative Insight Intelligence Force of Consciousness
In most spiritual traditions, love is seen only as universal or cosmic love.
Is it possible to live a life of activity while holding the perception of unity and fulfillment?
Francis Lucille answers questions at SAND19 US.
Aisha Salem talks of being willing to let go of our limitations, of keeping ourselves small, and of living our individuality
Being fully human requires the awakening of the deep Heart as well as the full embrace of the vulnerable human heart.
Creativity can be seen as a state of natural flow...
For me it is irrelevant, but let’s say for the Kashmirian tradition, as far as my teacher expressed…
Shaped and sustained by the nondual tradition of Kashmir Shivaism, Eric Baret’s words take us back to the simple observation of our felt sense of emotion and, ultimately, to pure listening.
Yoga does not bring us to truth, truth expresses itself through yoga.
The impossible predicament of being alive, the great wound that will not heal.
Please enter your email and we’ll send you instructions to reset your password