By Tom Bunzel
We’re all looking for answers and many of believe we can find them directly through science. With enough research and the right instruments all of reality is available to us.
The assumption behind this belief is that we are intelligent beings and presumably the most intelligent forms of nature that exist and without evidence to the contrary, have ever existed.
But just as our brains cannot quite get a handle on an infinite cosmos, or the quantum world, where our own participation forms an insoluble barrier to true understanding, biology poses an even bigger puzzle.
Beginning with simple calculators we have discovered a way to program; that is to instruct logically using symbols (language) in a way that can be executed through silicon first, and now through organic matter.
Software has evolved into artificial intelligence and now bio-hacking.
(A new method is called wetware and uses actual neurons instead of printed circuits but still uses code).
This ingenious evolution of our science has led us to an amazing discovery: the same sort of symbolically logical set of instructions was already present in every cell of every living organism.
By “sequencing” DNA according to four recurring symbols in specific patterns – A, C, T and G – we have unlocked many of the secrets of our biology and even made it possible to “copy and paste” this code from one host to another.
This has resulted in growing new organs for ourselves and even resurrecting extinct and nearly extinct species by placing their genetic code into the eggs of similar hosts.
Here you can see the code for the Ebola virus and the code for a web page (HTML) side by side.
Geneticist Juan Enriquez compares an apple to a computer application in his TED talk – when it receives sufficient energy from the sun (input) it executes its code (DNA) and falls from the tree.
But this raises an interesting question about “our” intelligence.
We now know from our own direct experience with such encoded intelligence, which we call software, that it was created by us intellectually and intentionally.
Every “program” written in this manner, operating from a cell phone to a supercomputer, was devised by human intelligent to perform a specific task.
Considering ourselves the apex of intelligence at the top of the pyramid of life, in an otherwise dead universe, from where did this software (DNA) arise.
Science skirts this all important question as irrelevant and inconvenient. A NASA video on the origin of life simply suggests that chemicals formed into DNA patters by accident or chance.
But if we really consider this issue there is one thing immediately apparent about all encoded intelligence – it is the product of mind.
Not necessarily “a mind” – but because it is a vessel or container of meaning all encoded intelligence represents mind product – or what we call with respect to software – intellectual property.
It seems clear to me, having done a bit of programming and taught end users how to perform tasks with software from Microsoft and others, that with DNA we have a program without the manual.
What the reality of DNA clearly points to is that our notion of intelligence or consciousness is fundamentally flawed or at best incomplete.
We cannot claim, anymore, to be the highest intelligence known or discovered because the instruction set to our own machinery is the product of an immense, possibly infinite intelligence.
Additionally, the apparent “answer” to this mystery, if there is on, must not be found in more information about DNA, but rather in our own nature.
What is mind? All of our inadequate definitions are circular and lead back us.
Similarly, words like “intelligence” and “consciousness” lead back to the mind that thinks or says them – they conceptual products of the agency of presumably, “our” minds.
So our brilliant science has led us to a precipice, well described by thinkers like Deepak Chopra and Eckhart Tolle who says, “the mind can’t know the Mind.”
It takes us back to the reality that what can or is known is not “the knower.”
So that our confrontation with the reality of DNA as “software” is really where for science and philosophy “the rubber meets the road.” Our claim at all knowing becomes suspect because we have come to an abyss from which we must of necessity move from a paradigm of separateness (we know things) to one of inclusion (we are what knows).
Where this leads is an open question – but clearly for science to continue to answer questions beyond those of simple control it must move to the level of Being – what, who or how are we sentient at all must be the next level of our scientific inquiry – or it can be nothing more than a means for temporary comfort and survival in an essentially foreign and hostile universe.
Tom Bunzel’s book, If DNA is Software, Who Wrote the Code? The Profound Significance of Life’s Programming Language, is now available directly from Azure Reading Books.
In the quest for innovative and functional designs, many scientists are now turning to nature for inspiration.
How the experienced self is put together out of memories and feelings.
Gabor Maté interviews James Doty on his book: "Into the Magic Shop" a conversation on trauma, healing, magic, and compassion.
If the conscious mind—the part you consider you—accounts for only a fraction of the brain's function, what is all the rest doing?
An "immersion" lecture into the world of psylocibin, mycelium and evolution of consciousness
Could crossmodal senses be one key to unlock the true nature of physics?
Sam and Annaka Harris speak with Donald Hoffman about his book The Case Against Reality.
The striving for spiritual attainment while excluding the personal dimension of life, is often a big error on the path of spiritual inquiry.
New research shows that the physical effects of trauma can be passed down to children and even to grandchildren
Is there any behavior that we can say for certain is unique to humans?
A four-billion-year-old cycling evolutionary engine of creation lifted us improbable and beautiful human beings into existence.
James Fadiman fieds questions at SAND18 US
21st-Century science is on the verge of recreating the processes that may have brought life into being
What are we? A soul? An immaterial mind? A flow of energy? Are we our bodies or neural patterns in our brains?
Neuroscientist Beau Lotto conducted an ambitious study with Cirque du Soleil on the emotion of awe
What Science and My Unusual Brain are Teaching us about the Convergence of Reality, Love, and the Senses
We assume our senses see reality as it is—but that could be just an evolved illusion obscuring the true workings of quantum theory and consciousness
New human multisensory integration model for its exploration.
Two realities can exist at the same time, at least in the quantum world, suggests a new study.
The source of capacity to optimize our experience...
We are aware of thinking and acting, and we typically think this is what neurons and brains are for.
Why adept meditators would be invaluable to studies
The study of epigenetics has changed how we look at the effect that our genetic inheritance has on our physical and mental health, as well as on that of our children and grandchildren.
Please enter your email and we’ll send you instructions to reset your password