By Ted Christopher
The author writes that his article is intended to make some overdue points, the most basic of which is that the scientific understanding of life is easy to question in significant ways. The scientific understanding’s DNA-basis, in particular, has hit an impasse. The associated mystery appears to be consistent with a common premodern understanding of life involving underlying souls and a reincarnation dynamic.
Support for this transcendental dynamic is significant in and of itself, and it also reinvigorates the potential of religious and spiritual perspectives or teachings, including those connected with self inquiry and meditation.
Final suggested points are to watch overdoing the modern infatuation with science (and the intellect), and to stay modest about one’s expectations with regards to meditation. It is OK to plod along in steady fashion!
Scientific materialism is the largely unquestioned basis for modern science’s understanding of life. It also holds enormous sway beyond science and thus has increasingly marginalized religious perspectives. Yet it is easy to find behavioral phenomena from the accepted literature that seriously challenge materialism. A number of these phenomena are very suggestive of reincarnation.
The larger test for science’s paradigm, though, as well as for any potential general import from reincarnation, is the DNA (or genetics)-based model of heredity. If that conception-beget, DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid)-carried model can be confirmed at the individual level then in a very substantial way we would be confirmed as material-only creatures. In particular, can behavioral genetics and personal genomics confirm their DNA-based presumptions? During the last decade enormous efforts have been made to find the DNA origins for a number of health and behavioral tendencies. These efforts have been an “absolutely beyond belief” failure and it is here that the scientific vision faces its biggest challenge.
The common pre-modern reincarnation understanding, on the other hand, fits well on a number of specific conundrums and offers a broad coherence across this unfolding missing heritability mystery. For people trying to make sense of a religious perspective or simply questioning materialism, you should be looking at the missing heritability problem.
Ted Christopher lives in Rochester, New York. He is trained in Computer and Information Science and Mathematics (University of Massachusetts at Amherst). Later in conjunction with research work in biomedical ultrasound he obtained a Masters and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering (University of Rochester). His outside interests and concerns expanded over the years from sustainability issues to include the modern understanding of life. Over the last twelve years he has investigated basic problems, always bearing in mind explanations offered by the premodern transcendental understanding. As a result of these efforts he has produced some writings, including a book, A Hole in Science.
Love is the refusal to separate —Nisargadatta Maharaj
We are aware of thinking and acting, and we typically think this is what neurons and brains are for.
What altered states of consciousness can tell us about consciousness itself
Scientists are slowly understanding collaboration’s role in biology
Sam Harris speaks with Iain McGilchrist about the differences between the right and left hemispheres.
Francis answers Jeanric's questions in this touching interview
While the personal level is an important foundation, the next level is to bring our practice to the interpersonal realm
Our primary evidence, our only certainty is consciousness.
Francis Lucille's dialogue with the audience at SAND19 US
The ancient Greeks dove into this question. But what do modern scientists think?
How can a fish become aware that it swims in that which it seeks?
When we avoid rooting in our dying bodies, spirituality grows spindly and bears no real fruit.
Please enter your email and we’ll send you instructions to reset your password