Quantum mechanics is known for its strangeness, from cats being dead and alive at the same time, to particles affecting other ones across vast distances. But as odd as those phenomena seem, there’s one implication of quantum mechanics that may “out-strange” all the others.
“Experiments indicate that the everyday world we perceive does not exist until observed,” writes scientist Bernardo Kastrup and colleagues earlier this year on Scientific American, adding that this suggests “a primary role for mind in nature.”
Observation has long been important for understanding quantum phenomena, including for one of its earliest tests—the double-slit experiment, first described by English physicist Thomas Young to members of the Royal Society in London in November 1803.
In this experiment, individual particles of light (or matter) are beamed at an opaque barrier with two slits. On the other side of the barrier is a photographic plate to record the arrival of the photons. You might expect them to form two spots on the plate coinciding with each of the slits.
What happens, though, is the photons create interference fringes—alternating bright and dark bands—like the kind you see when two sets of waves overlap. According to quantum mechanics, what passes through the slits is not particles, but wave functions—mathematic equations that describe the quantum state of a system.
When a photon’s wave function interacts with the photographic plate—in what is essentially a measurement or observation—the wave function “collapses” into a definite state. Sending many photons through the slits, with each wave function collapsing into a definite state, gives rise to the wave-like interference pattern. Before this measurement occurs, though, there’s no way of knowing where a photon will land.
This phenomenon led physicist Werner Heisenberg to write in 1958, “The idea of an objective real world whose smallest parts exist objectively in the same sense as stones or trees exist, independently of whether or not we observe them ... is impossible.”
For Kastrup and his colleagues, these types of measurements can only be performed by a conscious observer. They write that inanimate objects like a particle detector can’t truly measure a particle. With the double-slit experiment, “the output of the detectors only becomes known when it is consciously observed by a person,” writes Kastrup. Extending this to all of reality, he argues that a “transpersonal mind” underlies the material world.
Not everyone agrees. In a Scientific American article from earlier this month, author Anil Ananthaswamy writes that double-slit experiments don’t necessarily support the existence of a transpersonal mind or the need for a conscious observer to collapse a wave function.
Ananthaswamy does accept, however, that a measurement is needed for this collapse to occur, but he adds that quantum mechanics is unclear about the nature of that measurement. When experiments produce an interference pattern, the results simply support the need for “an ill-defined process called measurement. That’s all,” he writes.
He also points out that there are other ways to interpret the double-slit experiment that don’t require a conscious observer. One is the de Broglie-Bohm theory, also known as the pilot-wave model. In this theory, the photon (a particle) always has a definite position. But it’s riding a pilot wave that goes through both slits to produce the interference patterns.
Other theories provide reasons for the collapse of the wave function that have nothing to do with a conscious observer. One of these collapse theories argues that as the number of particles in a system increases, the likelihood of collapse also increases. Another theory suggests that objects with greater mass are more likely to collapse.
Experimenters are trying to test these theories, such as by sending larger and larger molecules through double slits in order to find the collapse threshold. Other researchers are working on putting one of the slits in a quantum superposition—being in two locations at once—in order to see how the mass of the slit affects its collapse.
Again, none of these theories require the presence of a conscious observer, suggests Ananthaswamy. He writes that in spite of these experiments, it’s too early to ”make any claims about the nature of reality.” This is especially true given that scientists have yet to agree on the nature of consciousness, let alone whether its observational powers are needed for quantum phenomenon to occur.
It is precisely science that makes the key point shine most brightly: the point that there is a fundamental respect in which ultimate intrinsic nature of the stuff of the universe is unknown to us — except insofar as it is consciousness.
Is math an invention of the human brain? Or does math exist in some abstract world, with humans merely discovering its truths? The debate has been raging since the time of the ancient Greeks.
The existence of an ether – an all-pervading medium composed of a subtler kind of matter – has been taught by mystic philosophers throughout the ages.
For well over a century, scientists have been wrestling with what quantum mechanics has been revealing to us about fundamental reality
Since childhood I have been fascinated by holograms. The reason was the science fiction movie Star Wars and in 1984 I watched it for the first time.
Billions of years ago, an iron nucleus forged in another galaxy was flung into space at close to the…
Over the past century, the total number of physicists has grown exponentially, as has the number of…
Physicist Neils Bohr once said, “Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it.”…
Imagine for a moment being in a church where mathematics groups meet regularly to solve geometry problems…
It was on the edge of Berlin on July 14, 1930, that science and spirituality came together in one of the most intellectually stimulating conversations in history
What’s wrong with mirrors? Most people know that they are backwards, reversing left and right sides,…
From the comfortable seat of our bodies (and built-in brains), it’s easy to think that consciousness…
Time is a contentious topic in physics. Some physicists, such as Julian Barbour, argue that it doesn’t even exist. Others, such as Carlo Rovelli, hold that it arises as a secondary effect of deeper quantum processes.
How did great mathematicians like Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein make the leap from understanding basic mathematical concepts to answering fundamental questions about the Universe?
In our everyday life, time flows in one direction—forward. When you put a frozen pizza in the hot oven, the pizza heats up. When you hit a baseball, it flies over the wall (if you’re having a good day at bat). When you knock a coffee mug off a table...
The most famous case study in science, prior to Freud, was published in 1728 in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society by the English surgeon William Cheselden, who attended Newton in his final illness.
If you were to stand outside the universe—outside both space and time—and look at your life, you would see your birth, your death and every moment in between laid out as distinct points.
Most of my life was spent as a materialist. I regarded physical matter as the basis of reality. From matter emerged biological organisms such as humans, which developed brains, and out of the brain emerged consciousness.
In physics, time exists but it has no preferred direction.
Scientists have discovered a distinct turbulent fluid pattern, surprisingly close to Kolmogorov’s equation, hidden in many of Van Gogh’s paintings.
In this exclusive interview with Dr. Alan Wallace we discuss consciousness, mathematics, practicing deep sleep states and meditation as preparation for dying consciously.
In this inspiring talk, the mathematician Edward Frenkel speaks about the beauty and elegance of mathematics
The way you react to the world and to the people around you is driven much more than you realize by unconscious aspects of your brain and body.
It's not only a big deal; it's the biggest deal of all.
Is there any behavior that we can say for certain is unique to humans?
Psychedelic drugs alter consciousness in a profound and novel way that increases the breadth and fluency of cognition. However, until recently, scientists were unable to offer an explanation for how the brain was altered to account for these effects.
Just as artists are driven to create, scientists need to prove that something is as it seems. Their mantra is, don’t tell me, show me through repeated tests that arrive at the same results every time.
Stuart Hameroff, co-founder of the Toward a Science of Consciousness conference, follows a brief overview…
Beneath your feet lies an enormous subterranean biosphere of bacteria and other forms of life, surviving…
Donald Hoffman reminds us that we can predict people's choices up to seven seconds before they are conscious of making that choice.
According to Charles Darwin, you are the product of your biological mother and father, just as they were the product of their biological mother and father, and so on back to the earliest days of humans and to all the species that came before.
In recent years scientists have been exploring the effects that stress and emotions have on our cells — in particular, on our chromosomes and mitochondrial DNA.
Underneath the ground exists a vast “social network” that connects trees and other plants to each other.
The source of capacity to optimize our experience...
In order to understand the true nature of reality, science must first recognize the importance of consciousness, says Dr. Robert Lanza, a stem-cell biologist whose work has earned him high acclaim.
The most radical understanding of reality points first to radical wholeness, to the prior unity of all opposites and conditional experiences.
Scientists at UC Berkeley have placed volunteers in an fMRI scanner and monitored blood flow in their brain activity for two hours, while having them listen to stories. The result: they were able to map which areas respond to different words.
Please enter your email and we’ll send you instructions to reset your password