One of the biggest pastimes of quantum physicists is pondering the nature of reality. However, when you move from everyday objects like chairs and tables down to the quantum level—the realm of particles like atoms and electrons—things tend to get a little weird.
Here, in this quantum world, the thinking that gets us through our day, that allows us to pick up objects and set them on other objects, no longer applies. We move beyond interacting with the world at a scale that can be measured with rulers, and into one where particles are the main increment.
It turns out, as physicist Adam Frank explains in the NPR radio program 13.7: Cosmos & Culture, that making this transition to the world of particles requires us to first understand one of the most fundamental concepts of quantum physics—the wave function.
Frank puts the wave function into perspective by looking at it through the lens of the atom. Objects are composed of atoms and “each atom is made of electrons and a nucleus that are all the merest flecks of matter separated by oceans and oceans of nothingness,” says Frank. If that is true, then how can anything feel solid?
This is where the wave function—and wave-particle duality — comes in. Particles like electrons can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior, depending on the kind of experiment you are running. Particles exist in a single point. Waves, however, spread out in many directions—which is how atoms can form solid objects.
The wave function describes this wave-like spread of electrons around a nucleus—also known as the “electron cloud.” The wave function also gives you the probability that an electron will exist at specific locations, hence the other name for the cloud of electrons around the nucleus—the “cloud of possibility.”
So when we think of electrons in terms of the wave function, says Frank, atoms are no longer mostly empty space. And the electron cloud around the nucleus is not infinitesimally small; it’s actually the size of the atom itself. Which means that objects that you can hold in your hand and place on top of other objects are not filled with empty space, either.
That, of course, is a good thing. Without solidity, it would be very difficult to interact with the world. But this also shows that the “weirdness” of quantum physics can lead to some very concrete aspects of our macro-universe.
Discrepancies in measures of expansion may point to new physics
Reversing history from Galileo's time, it is now the scientists who refuse to look through the telescope.
In this inspiring talk, the mathematician Edward Frenkel speaks about the beauty and elegance of mathematics
How can there be intelligence without consciousness?
Ever wonder how we try to predict the unpredictable? Supercomputers use the power of chaos theory.
Engineers crack 58-year-old puzzle on way to quantum breakthrough
Donald Hoffman reminds us that we can predict people's choices up to seven seconds before they are conscious of making that choice.
This video is about Bell's Theorem, one of the most fascinating results in 20th century physics.
You wouldn’t find baseballs entangled in such a way that hitting one affects another miles away.
So-called “information realism” has some surprising implications
We've detected puny, stellar-mass black holes. And we've detected giant, supermassive black holes. But what about those in the middle?
There is a mystery that has confounded scientists for a century.
In a curved universe, no matter which direction you travel in, you will end up at the starting point
Please enter your email and we’ll send you instructions to reset your password